[//]: # (SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-4.0) # Maintainers ## Maintainer Scopes, GitHub Roles and GitHub Teams Maintainers are assigned the following scopes in this repository: | Scope | Definition | GitHub Role | GitHub Team | | ----- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | | Maintainer | The GitHub Maintain role | Maintain | `aries-bbs-maintainers` | ## Active Maintainers | Name | GitHub ID | Scope | LFID | Discord ID | Email | Company Affiliation | | ----------------- | --------------- | ---------- | ---- | ---------- | ----- | ------------------- | | Michael Lodder | mikelodder7 | Maintainer | | | | | | Stephen Curran | swcurran | Maintainer | | | | BC Gov | | Wade Barnes | WadeBarnes | Maintainer | | | | BC Gov | | Andrew Whitehead | andrewwhitehead | Maintainer | | | | BC Gov | | Timo Glastra | TimoGlastra | Maintainer | | | | Animo Solutions | | Berend Sliedrecht | blu3beri | Maintainer | | | | Animo Solutions | ## Emeritus Maintainers | Name | GitHub ID | Scope | LFID | Discord ID | Email | Company Affiliation | |----- | --------- | ----- | ---- | ---------- | ----- | ------------------- | | | | | | | | | ## The Duties of a Maintainer Maintainers are expected to perform the following duties for this repository. The duties are listed in more or less priority order: - Review, respond, and act on any security vulnerabilities reported against the repository. - Review, provide feedback on, and merge or reject GitHub Pull Requests from Contributors. - Review, triage, comment on, and close GitHub Issues submitted by Contributors. - When appropriate, lead/facilitate architectural discussions in the community. - When appropriate, lead/facilitate the creation of a product roadmap. - Create, clarify, and label issues to be worked on by Contributors. - Ensure that there is a well defined (and ideally automated) product test and release pipeline, including the publication of release artifacts. - When appropriate, execute the product release process. - Maintain the repository CONTRIBUTING.md file and getting started documents to give guidance and encouragement to those wanting to contribute to the product, and those wanting to become maintainers. - Contribute to the product via GitHub Pull Requests. - Monitor requests from the Hyperledger Technical Oversight Committee about the contents and management of Hyperledger repositories, such as branch handling, required files in repositories and so on. - Contribute to the Hyperledger Project's Quarterly Report. ## Becoming a Maintainer This community welcomes contributions. Interested contributors are encouraged to progress to become maintainers. To become a maintainer the following steps occur, roughly in order. - The proposed maintainer establishes their reputation in the community, including authoring five (5) significant merged pull requests, and expresses an interest in becoming a maintainer for the repository. - A PR is created to update this file to add the proposed maintainer to the list of active maintainers. - The PR is authored by an existing maintainer or has a comment on the PR from an existing maintainer supporting the proposal. - The PR is authored by the proposed maintainer or has a comment on the PR from the proposed maintainer confirming their interest in being a maintainer. - The PR or comment from the proposed maintainer must include their willingness to be a long-term (more than 6 month) maintainer. - Once the PR and necessary comments have been received, an approval timeframe begins. - The PR **MUST** be communicated on all appropriate communication channels, including relevant community calls, chat channels and mailing lists. Comments of support from the community are welcome. - The PR is merged and the proposed maintainer becomes a maintainer if either: - Two weeks have passed since at least three (3) Maintainer PR approvals have been recorded, OR - An absolute majority of maintainers have approved the PR. - If the PR does not get the requisite PR approvals, it may be closed. - Once the add maintainer PR has been merged, any necessary updates to the GitHub Teams are made. ## Removing Maintainers Being a maintainer is not a status symbol or a title to be carried indefinitely. It will occasionally be necessary and appropriate to move a maintainer to emeritus status. This can occur in the following situations: - Resignation of a maintainer. - Violation of the Code of Conduct warranting removal. - Inactivity. - A general measure of inactivity will be no commits or code review comments for one reporting quarter. This will not be strictly enforced if the maintainer expresses a reasonable intent to continue contributing. - Reasonable exceptions to inactivity will be granted for known long term leave such as parental leave and medical leave. - Other circumstances at the discretion of the other Maintainers. The process to move a maintainer from active to emeritus status is comparable to the process for adding a maintainer, outlined above. In the case of voluntary resignation, the Pull Request can be merged following a maintainer PR approval. If the removal is for any other reason, the following steps **SHOULD** be followed: - A PR is created to update this file to move the maintainer to the list of emeritus maintainers. - The PR is authored by, or has a comment supporting the proposal from, an existing maintainer or Hyperledger GitHub organization administrator. - Once the PR and necessary comments have been received, the approval timeframe begins. - The PR **MAY** be communicated on appropriate communication channels, including relevant community calls, chat channels and mailing lists. - The PR is merged and the maintainer transitions to maintainer emeritus if: - The PR is approved by the maintainer to be transitioned, OR - Two weeks have passed since at least three (3) Maintainer PR approvals have been recorded, OR - An absolute majority of maintainers have approved the PR. - If the PR does not get the requisite PR approvals, it may be closed. Returning to active status from emeritus status uses the same steps as adding a new maintainer. Note that the emeritus maintainer already has the 5 required significant changes as there is no contribution time horizon for those.