# [short title of solved problem and solution]

* Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0000](ADR-0000.md)] <!-- optional -->
* Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
* Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->

Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->

## Context and Problem Statement

[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]

## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->

* [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
* [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
* … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->

## Considered Options

* [option 1]
* [option 2]
* [option 3]
* [option 4]
* … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->

## Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->

* [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
* …

### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->

* [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
* …

## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->

### Option 1: [option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

#### [option 1] is good, because
* [argument a]
* [argument b]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

#### [option 1] is bad, because
* [argument c]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

### Option 2: [option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

#### [option 2] is good, because
* [argument a]
* [argument b]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

#### [option 2] is bad, because
* [argument c]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

### Option 3: [option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

#### [option 3] is good, because
* [argument a]
* [argument b]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

#### [option 3] is bad, because
* [argument c]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

### Option 4: [option 4]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

#### [option 4] is good, because
* [argument a]
* [argument b]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

#### [option 4] is bad, because
* [argument c]
* … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

## Links <!-- optional -->

* [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
* … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
```