jwalk ======= Filesystem walk. - Performed in parallel using rayon - Entries streamed in sorted order - Custom sort/filter/skip/state [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/Byron/jwalk.svg?branch=main)](https://travis-ci.org/Byron/jwalk) [![Latest version](http://meritbadge.herokuapp.com/jwalk)](https://crates.io/crates/jwalk) ### Usage Add this to your `Cargo.toml`: ```toml [dependencies] jwalk = "0.5" ``` Lean More: [docs.rs/jwalk](https://docs.rs/jwalk) ### Example Recursively iterate over the "foo" directory sorting by name: ```rust use jwalk::{WalkDir}; for entry in WalkDir::new("foo").sort(true) { println!("{}", entry?.path().display()); } ``` ### Inspiration This crate is inspired by both [`walkdir`](https://crates.io/crates/walkdir) and [`ignore`](https://crates.io/crates/ignore). It attempts to combine the parallelism of `ignore` with `walkdir`'s streaming iterator API. Some code and comments are copied directly from `walkdir`. ### Why use this crate? This crate is particularly good when you want streamed sorted results. In my tests it's about 4x `walkdir` speed for sorted results with metadata. Also this crate's `process_read_dir` callback allows you to arbitrarily sort/filter/skip/state entries before they are yielded. ### Why not use this crate? Directory traversal is already pretty fast. If you don't need this crate's speed then `walkdir` provides a smaller and more tested single threaded implementation. This crates parallelism happens at the directory level. It will help when walking deep file systems with many directories. It wont help when reading a single directory with many files. ### Benchmarks [Benchmarks](https://github.com/jessegrosjean/jwalk/blob/main/benches/benchmarks.md) comparing this crate with `walkdir` and `ignore`.