[![GitHub CI](https://github.com/jedisct1/rust-jwt-simple/workflows/Rust/badge.svg)](https://github.com/jedisct1/rust-jwt-simple/actions) [![Docs.rs](https://docs.rs/jwt-simple/badge.svg)](https://docs.rs/jwt-simple/) [![crates.io](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/jwt-simple.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/jwt-simple) - [JWT-Simple](#jwt-simple) - [Usage](#usage) - [Authentication (symmetric, `HS*` JWT algorithms) example](#authentication-symmetric-hs-jwt-algorithms-example) - [Keys and tokens creation](#keys-and-tokens-creation) - [Token verification](#token-verification) - [Signatures (asymmetric, `RS*`, `PS*`, `ES*` and `EdDSA` algorithms) example](#signatures-asymmetric-rs-ps-es-and-eddsa-algorithms-example) - [Key pairs and tokens creation](#key-pairs-and-tokens-creation) - [ES256](#es256) - [ES384](#es384) - [Advanced usage](#advanced-usage) - [Custom claims](#custom-claims) - [Peeking at metadata before verification](#peeking-at-metadata-before-verification) - [Creating and attaching key identifiers](#creating-and-attaching-key-identifiers) - [Mitigations against replay attacks](#mitigations-against-replay-attacks) - [CWT (CBOR) support](#cwt-cbor-support) - [Working around compilation issues with the `boring` crate](#working-around-compilation-issues-with-the-boring-crate) - [Usage in Web browsers](#usage-in-web-browsers) - [Why yet another JWT crate](#why-yet-another-jwt-crate) # JWT-Simple A new JWT (JSON Web Tokens) implementation for Rust that focuses on simplicity, while avoiding common JWT security pitfalls. `jwt-simple` is unopinionated and supports all commonly deployed authentication and signature algorithms: | JWT algorithm name | Description | | ------------------ | ------------------------------------- | | `HS256` | HMAC-SHA-256 | | `HS384` | HMAC-SHA-384 | | `HS512` | HMAC-SHA-512 | | `BLAKE2B` | BLAKE2B-256 | | `RS256` | RSA with PKCS#1v1.5 padding / SHA-256 | | `RS384` | RSA with PKCS#1v1.5 padding / SHA-384 | | `RS512` | RSA with PKCS#1v1.5 padding / SHA-512 | | `PS256` | RSA with PSS padding / SHA-256 | | `PS384` | RSA with PSS padding / SHA-384 | | `PS512` | RSA with PSS padding / SHA-512 | | `ES256` | ECDSA over p256 / SHA-256 | | `ES384` | ECDSA over p384 / SHA-384 | | `ES256K` | ECDSA over secp256k1 / SHA-256 | | `EdDSA` | Ed25519 | `jwt-simple` can be compiled out of the box to WebAssembly/WASI. It is fully compatible with Fastly _Compute_ service. Important: JWT's purpose is to verify that data has been created by a party knowing a secret key. It does not provide any kind of confidentiality: JWT data is simply encoded as BASE64, and is not encrypted. ## Usage `cargo.toml`: ```toml [dependencies] jwt-simple = "0.12" ``` Rust: ```rust use jwt_simple::prelude::*; ``` Errors are returned as `jwt_simple::Error` values (alias for the `Error` type of the `thiserror` crate). ## Authentication (symmetric, `HS*` JWT algorithms) example Authentication schemes use the same key for creating and verifying tokens. In other words, both parties need to ultimately trust each other, or else the verifier could also create arbitrary tokens. ### Keys and tokens creation Key creation: ```rust use jwt_simple::prelude::*; // create a new key for the `HS256` JWT algorithm let key = HS256Key::generate(); ``` A key can be exported as bytes with `key.to_bytes()`, and restored with `HS256Key::from_bytes()`. Token creation: ```rust /// create claims valid for 2 hours let claims = Claims::create(Duration::from_hours(2)); let token = key.authenticate(claims)?; ``` -> Done! ### Token verification ```rust let claims = key.verify_token::(&token, None)?; ``` -> Done! No additional steps required. Key expiration, start time, authentication tags, etc. are automatically verified. The function fails with `JWTError::InvalidAuthenticationTag` if the authentication tag is invalid for the given key. The full set of claims can be inspected in the `claims` object if necessary. `NoCustomClaims` means that only the standard set of claims is used by the application, but application-defined claims can also be supported. Extra verification steps can optionally be enabled via the `ValidationOptions` structure: ```rust let mut options = VerificationOptions::default(); // Accept tokens that will only be valid in the future options.accept_future = true; // Accept tokens even if they have expired up to 15 minutes after the deadline, // and/or they will be valid within 15 minutes. options.time_tolerance = Some(Duration::from_mins(15)); // Reject tokens if they were issued more than 1 hour ago options.max_validity = Some(Duration::from_hours(1)); // Reject tokens if they don't include an issuer from that set options.allowed_issuers = Some(HashSet::from_strings(&["example app"])); // see the documentation for the full list of available options let claims = key.verify_token::(&token, Some(options))?; ``` Note that `allowed_issuers` and `allowed_audiences` are not strings, but sets of strings (using the `HashSet` type from the Rust standard library), as the application can allow multiple return values. ## Signatures (asymmetric, `RS*`, `PS*`, `ES*` and `EdDSA` algorithms) example A signature requires a key pair: a secret key used to create tokens, and a public key, that can only verify them. Always use a signature scheme if both parties do not ultimately trust each other, such as tokens exchanged between clients and API providers. ### Key pairs and tokens creation Key creation: #### ES256 ```rust use jwt_simple::prelude::*; // create a new key pair for the `ES256` JWT algorithm let key_pair = ES256KeyPair::generate(); // a public key can be extracted from a key pair: let public_key = key_pair.public_key(); ``` #### ES384 ```rust use jwt_simple::prelude::*; // create a new key pair for the `ES384` JWT algorithm let key_pair = ES384KeyPair::generate(); // a public key can be extracted from a key pair: let public_key = key_pair.public_key(); ``` Keys can be exported as bytes for later reuse, and imported from bytes or, for RSA, from individual parameters, DER-encoded data or PEM-encoded data. RSA key pair creation, using OpenSSL and PEM importation of the secret key: ```sh openssl genrsa -out private.pem 2048 openssl rsa -in private.pem -outform PEM -pubout -out public.pem ``` ```rust let key_pair = RS384KeyPair::from_pem(private_pem_file_content)?; let public_key = RS384PublicKey::from_pem(public_pem_file_content)?; ``` Token creation and verification work the same way as with `HS*` algorithms, except that tokens are created with a key pair, and verified using the corresponding public key. Token creation: ```rust /// create claims valid for 2 hours let claims = Claims::create(Duration::from_hours(2)); let token = key_pair.sign(claims)?; ``` Token verification: ```rust let claims = public_key.verify_token::(&token, None)?; ``` Available verification options are identical to the ones used with symmetric algorithms. ## Advanced usage ### Custom claims Claim objects support all the standard claims by default, and they can be set directly or via convenient helpers: ```rust let claims = Claims::create(Duration::from_hours(2)). with_issuer("Example issuer").with_subject("Example subject"); ``` But application-defined claims can also be defined. These simply have to be present in a serializable type (this requires the `serde` crate): ```rust #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)] struct MyAdditionalData { user_is_admin: bool, user_country: String, } let my_additional_data = MyAdditionalData { user_is_admin: false, user_country: "FR".to_string(), }; ``` Claim creation with custom data: ```rust let claims = Claims::with_custom_claims(my_additional_data, Duration::from_secs(30)); ``` Claim verification with custom data. Note the presence of the custom data type: ```rust let claims = public_key.verify_token::(&token, None)?; let user_is_admin = claims.custom.user_is_admin; ``` ### Peeking at metadata before verification Properties such as the key identifier can be useful prior to tag or signature verification in order to pick the right key out of a set. ```rust let metadata = Token::decode_metadata(&token)?; let key_id = metadata.key_id(); let algorithm = metadata.algorithm(); // all other standard properties are also accessible ``` **IMPORTANT:** neither the key ID nor the algorithm can be trusted. This is an unfixable design flaw of the JWT standard. As a result, `algorithm` should be used only for debugging purposes, and never to select a key type. Similarly, `key_id` should be used only to select a key in a set of keys made for the same algorithm. At the bare minimum, verification using `HS*` must be prohibited if a signature scheme was originally used to create the token. ### Creating and attaching key identifiers Key identifiers indicate to verifiers what public key (or shared key) should be used for verification. They can be attached at any time to existing shared keys, key pairs and public keys: ```rust let public_key_with_id = public_key.with_key_id(&"unique key identifier"); ``` Instead of delegating this to applications, `jwt-simple` can also create such an identifier for an existing key: ```rust let key_id = public_key.create_key_id(); ``` This creates an text-encoded identifier for the key, attaches it, and returns it. If an identifier has been attached to a shared key or a key pair, tokens created with them will include it. ### Mitigations against replay attacks `jwt-simple` includes mechanisms to mitigate replay attacks: * Nonces can be created and attached to new tokens using the `create_nonce()` claim function. The verification procedure can later reject any token that doesn't include the expected nonce (`required_nonce` verification option). * The verification procedure can reject tokens created too long ago, no matter what their expiration date is. This prevents tokens from malicious (or compromised) signers from being used for too long. * The verification procedure can reject tokens created before a date. For a given user, the date of the last successful authentication can be stored in a database, and used later along with this option to reject older (replayed) tokens. ### CWT (CBOR) support The development code includes a `cwt` cargo feature that enables experimental parsing and validation of CWT tokens. Please note that CWT doesn't support custom claims. The required identifiers [haven't been standardized yet](https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/cwt.xhtml). Also, the existing Rust crates for JSON and CBOR deserialization are not safe. An untrusted party can send a serialized object that requires a lot of memory and CPU to deserialize. Band-aids have been added for JSON, but with the current Rust tooling, it would be tricky to do for CBOR. As a mitigation, we highly recommend rejecting tokens that would be too large in the context of your application. That can be done by with the `max_token_length` verification option. ## Working around compilation issues with the `boring` crate As a temporary workaround for portability issues with one of the dependencies (the `boring` crate), this library can be compiled to use only Rust implementations. In order to do so, import the crate with `default-features=false, features=["pure-rust"]` in your Cargo configuration. Do not do it unconditionally. This is only required for very specific setups and targets, and only until issues with the `boring` crate have been solved. The way to configure this in Cargo may also change in future versions. Static builds targeting the `musl` library don't require that workaround. Just use [`cargo-zigbuild`](https://github.com/rust-cross/cargo-zigbuild) to build your project. ## Usage in Web browsers The `wasm32-freestanding` target (still sometimes called `wasm32-unknown-unknown` in Rust) is supported (as in "it compiles"). However, using a native JavaScript implementation is highly recommended instead. There are high-quality JWT implementations in JavaScript, leveraging the WebCrypto API, that provide better performance and security guarantees than a WebAssembly module. ## Why yet another JWT crate This crate is not an endorsement of JWT. JWT is [an awful design](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8725), and one of the many examples that "but this is a standard" doesn't necessarily mean that it is good. I would highly recommend [PASETO](https://github.com/paragonie/paseto) or [Biscuit](https://github.com/CleverCloud/biscuit) instead if you control both token creation and verification. However, JWT is still widely used in the industry, and remains absolutely mandatory to communicate with popular APIs. This crate was designed to: * Be simple to use, even to people who are new to Rust * Avoid common JWT API pitfalls * Support features widely in use. I'd love to limit the algorithm choices to Ed25519, but other methods are required to connect to existing APIs, so just provide them (with the exception of the `None` signature method for obvious reasons). * Minimize code complexity and external dependencies * Automatically perform common tasks to prevent misuse. Signature verification and claims validation happen automatically instead of relying on applications. * Still allow power users to access everything JWT tokens include if they really need to * Work out of the box in a WebAssembly environment, so that it can be used in function-as-a-service platforms.