ietf1._domainkey.ietf.org k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDNzNnjKTd5cczd2CDzHflCZuv1tMWYwd7zE+deoJ6s/fXR7/n9ZIBnDS5egt7HAHjNjZrmjcoRlfSsNxRJvUQFyYvaU1BT1s8R+mkPgSOqZ4t9HqAVjiczn2B9+dbjdNN+S/zvSyMMuSCSJDKKAXhBpDeQTpeY7/UdP9s6ws0yjQIDAQAB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1667592145; bh=M3BM66+ux2IbqyOhw6XrN0rYwgjbrSbsG7H+29IL9UQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=QmIyawDUToz+fNTD9NUhb3S2jSSGpzsvQvvxhL1pTVgpmT+6f+eFLK3CHbPVpjxat ZrbpzMAopEXPvGZzX9kTDtjtuePS9ai7Y7ZOh7mRA0YBf8pm9OHfuROZdxLQeOBSBd OYMZ3+NBJ2nVMcP2quGK08xKRf2x6w8vjf80vRMk= X-Mailbox-Line: From emailcore-bounces@ietf.org Fri Nov 4 13:02:25 2022 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E112C1522AC; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1667592145; bh=M3BM66+ux2IbqyOhw6XrN0rYwgjbrSbsG7H+29IL9UQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=QmIyawDUToz+fNTD9NUhb3S2jSSGpzsvQvvxhL1pTVgpmT+6f+eFLK3CHbPVpjxat ZrbpzMAopEXPvGZzX9kTDtjtuePS9ai7Y7ZOh7mRA0YBf8pm9OHfuROZdxLQeOBSBd OYMZ3+NBJ2nVMcP2quGK08xKRf2x6w8vjf80vRMk= X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45488C14CE2D for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:02:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.906 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPvKqVQ91cB6 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E964C14CF0D for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1or2tR-000LNT-Uq for emailcore@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:02:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:02:16 -0400 From: John C Klensin To: emailcore@ietf.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [Emailcore] rfc5321bis appendix I.2 (eighth item in -14; bullet 8 in -15) X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: emailcore-bounces@ietf.org Sender: "Emailcore" Hi. This bullet item is about whether this document should explicitly obsolete RFCs 1846 and 7504, as reflected in drafts up to this point. There have been no comments in response. The changes due to those documents are discussed in Section 1.2. Unless there are comments (and, presumably at least the beginning of a decision) to the contrary between and shortly after IETF 115, I will treat the question as settled and remove the comments in rfc5321bis-16. john -- Emailcore mailing list Emailcore@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore