This derive macro creates a `const fn new` associated function receiving as parameters the same fields declared in your `struct`.
So this:
```rust
#[derive(New)]
struct Cube {
r: i32,
c: i32,
z: i32,
w: i32,
}
```
... will create this:
```rust
impl Cube {
const fn new(r: i32, c: i32, z: i32, w: i32) -> Self {
Self { r, c, z, w }
}
}
```
ps: Rust Analyzer already generates `new` function for you!
![Generate new](imgs/rust-analyzer-new-function.png)
https://rust-analyzer.github.io/manual.html#assists-code-actions
ps2: I just found (2023-11-12) another crate that already does that! =)
And it's funny that it has the same name, but swapped:
[derive-new](https://github.com/nrc/derive-new/tree/master)
It's more powerful than this one, because it handles default values, enums
and `PhantomData`.
**Although** this crate creates a `const` fn, while `derive-new` doesn't.
## Using it
https://crates.io/crates/new-derive
```
cargo add new-derive
```
```rust
`use new_derive::New;
#[derive(New)]
struct Cube {
r: i32,
c: i32,
z: i32,
w: i32,
}
#[derive(Debug, New)]
struct V {
b: Vec,
}
#[derive(Debug, New)]
struct B {
b: Box,
}
#[derive(Debug, New)]
struct S1 {
array1: [i32; 3],
name: String,
}
#[derive(Debug, New)]
struct S2 {
opt1: Option,
idx: usize,
map1: std::collections::HashMap,
}
#[derive(Debug, New)]
struct Life1<'a> {
name: &'a str,
}
fn main() {
let cube = Cube::new(1, 2, 3, 4);
println!("{}", cube.r * cube.c * cube.z * cube.w);
let s1 = S1::new([1, 2, 3], "Leandro".into());
dbg!(s1);
let map1 = std::collections::HashMap::from([(10, 20)]);
let s2 = S2::new(Some("ola".into()), 30, map1);
dbg!(s2);
let country = "Brazil";
let lifetime_test = Life1::new(country);
println!("Country is: {}", lifetime_test.name);
}
```
Output:
```
24
[src/main.rs:44] s1 = S1 {
array1: [
1,
2,
3,
],
name: "Leandro",
}
[src/main.rs:48] s2 = S2 {
opt1: Some(
"ola",
),
idx: 30,
map1: {
10: 20,
},
}
Country is: Brazil
```