Crates.io | attribution |
lib.rs | attribution |
version | 0.5.0 |
source | src |
created_at | 2019-07-18 21:47:13.26027 |
updated_at | 2020-06-26 14:20:16.026083 |
description | A declarative custom attribute parsing framework |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/chuck-flowers/attribution |
max_upload_size | |
id | 149964 |
size | 21,738 |
Attribution is a crate that makes parsing attribute-style procedural macros as easy as declaring a struct.
Let's see it in action. Imagine that we want to create a procedural macro
attribute called ez_trace
. That adds a custom message to the beginning and
end of a method call. See the example below for how the usage of this attribute
would appear.
#[ez_trace(start = "Starting...", end = "Ending...")]
fn my_func() {
println!("Do some work");
}
In order to parse such an attribute we would need to add the following code to our hypothetical procedural macro crate.
lib.rs
#[attr_args]
struct EzTraceArgs {
start: String,
end: String
}
fn ez_trace(attr_ts: TokenStream, func_ts: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
let args = syn::parse_macro_input!(attr_ts as EzTraceArgs);
/// Remaining macro implementation...
}
With the above code, args
will contain the string values start
and end
("Starting..."
and "Ending..."
respectively). To parse additional parameters
simply add more fields to the EzTraceArgs
struct. Currently the supported
types are: String
, u64
, and bool
. Support for more standard library types
will arrive in the future and the ability to use custom types will also arrive
later.
If you'd like to support further development of attribution there are a few things you can do. Feel free to open an issue here for any bugs you come across or any feature requests you have for future releases of attribution. For bugs, please include the minimal code required to produce the bug in the issue description along with what you expect to happen and what actually happens.
I will be adding a link soon to accept financial donations if you so wish. I will continue to work on the project regardless of financial donations but if you find attribution useful and would like to buy me a cup of coffee I would be very grateful.
I don't intend to accept pull requests at this time because I feel it would be unethical to solicit donations and accept pull requests without financially compensating the submitter. I don't want to get bogged down in the process of determining what a fair share of the donations would be. I also feel the scope and codebase of the project is small enough that I should be able to handle any issues that appear in a timely manner.