Crates.io | derive-adhoc-macros |
lib.rs | derive-adhoc-macros |
version | 0.8.4 |
source | src |
created_at | 2022-07-01 15:28:19.558516 |
updated_at | 2024-03-27 15:45:36.512265 |
description | Macros that implement the derive_adhoc crate |
homepage | https://gitlab.torproject.org/Diziet/rust-derive-deftly |
repository | https://gitlab.torproject.org/Diziet/rust-derive-deftly |
max_upload_size | |
id | 617203 |
size | 233,918 |
derive-adhoc
allows you to write macros which are driven
by Rust data structures, just like proc macro derive macros,
but without having to wrestle with the proc macro system.
Maintenance - status of this crate
This library has now been renamed to
derive-deftly
,
which has some significant improvements.
We recommend that users upgrade to that crate,
when it is convenient to do so.
This crate, derive-adhoc
, will get important bugfixes,
but not new features etc.
Everything is renamed and there are other breaking changes; consult derive-deftly's changelog for information about how to upgrade.
As of derive-deftly 0.10.0, the template syntax does not have breaking changes.
You can write an ad-hoc template, which can speak about the fields and types in the data structure. You can also define named templates and apply them to multiple structures: effectively, you can define your own derive macro.
You don't need to make a separate proc macro crate,
write to the syn
and proc_macro
APIs.
take care to properly propagate compile errors,
or, generally, do any of the things that
make writing proc macros so complicated.
The template language resembles the "expander" part
of a macro_rules
macro,
but you don't have to write the "matcher" part:
derive-adhoc parses the input data structure for you,
and makes the pieces available via predefined expansion variables.
Further documentation is available in the doc_
module(s)
and the docs for the individual proc macros.
Vec
containing enum variant namesuse derive_adhoc::{define_derive_adhoc, Adhoc};
define_derive_adhoc! {
ListVariants =
impl $ttype {
fn list_variants() -> Vec<&'static str> {
vec![ $( stringify!( $vname ) , ) ]
}
}
}
#[derive(Adhoc)]
#[derive_adhoc(ListVariants)]
enum Enum {
UnitVariant,
StructVariant { a: u8, b: u16 },
TupleVariant(u8, u16),
}
assert_eq!(
Enum::list_variants(),
["UnitVariant", "StructVariant", "TupleVariant"],
);
Why not have a look at our friendly introduction?
It will walk you through derive-adhoc's most important features, with a number of worked examples,