Crates.io | finalfusion |
lib.rs | finalfusion |
version | 0.18.0 |
source | src |
created_at | 2019-03-19 18:20:04.381664 |
updated_at | 2023-10-10 10:15:57.035856 |
description | Reader and writer for common word embedding formats |
homepage | https://github.com/finalfusion/finalfusion-rust |
repository | https://github.com/finalfusion/finalfusion-rust |
max_upload_size | |
id | 122500 |
size | 559,373 |
finalfusion
is a crate for reading, writing, and using embeddings in Rust.
finalfusion
primarily works with its own
format which supports a large variety of
features. Additionally, the fastText, floret, GloVe, and word2vec file formats
are also supported.
finalfusion
is API stable since 0.11.0. However, we cannot tag
version 1 yet, because several dependencies that are exposed through
the API have not reached version 1 (particularly ndarray
and
rand
). Future 0.x releases of finalfusion
will be used to accomodate
updates of these dependencies.
Heads-up: there is a small API change between finalfusion 0.11 and
0.12. The Error
type has been moved from finalfusion::io
to
finalfusion::error
. The separate ErrorKind
enum has been merged
with Error
. Error
is now marked as non-exhaustive, so that new
error variants can be added in the future without changing the API.
To make finalfusion
available in your crate, simply place the following
in your Cargo.toml
finalfusion = 0.16
Loading embeddings and querying it is as simple as:
use std::fs::File;
use std::io::BufReader;
use finalfusion::prelude::*;
fn main() {
let mut reader = BufReader::new(File::open("embeddings.fifu").unwrap());
let embeds = Embeddings::<VocabWrap, StorageWrap>::read_embeddings(&mut reader).unwrap();
embeds.embedding("Query").unwrap();
}
finalfusion
supports a variety of formats:
Moreover, finalfusion
provides:
For more information, please consult the API documentation.
Embeddings trained with finalfrontier starting
with version 0.4
are in finalfusion
format and compatible with his crate. A growing set
of pretrained embeddings is offered on our website
and we have converted the fastText Wikipedia and Common Crawl embeddings to finalfusion
.
More information can also be found at https://finalfusion.github.io.
Quantized embeddings store embeddings as discrete representations. Imagine that for a given embeddings space, you would find 256 prototypical embeddings. Each embedding could then be stored as a 1-byte pointer to one of these prototypical embeddings. Of course, having only 256 possible representations, this quantized embedding space would be very coarse-grained.
product quantizers (pq) solve this problem by splitting each embedding evenly into q subvectors and finding prototypical vectors for each set of subvectors. If we use 256 prototypical representations for each subspace, 256^q different word embeddings can be represented. For instance, if q = 150, we could represent 250^150 different embeddings. Each embedding would then be stored as 150 byte-sized pointers.
optimized product quantizers (opq) additionally applies a linear map to the embedding space to distribute variance across embedding dimensions.
By quantizing an embedding matrix, its size can be reduced both on disk and in memory.
Normally, we read embeddings into memory. However, as an alternative the embeddings can be memory mapped. Memory mapping makes the on-disk embedding matrix available as pages in virtual memory. The operating system will then (transparently) load these pages into physical memory as necessary.
Memory mapping speeds up the initial loading time of word embeddings, since only the vocabulary needs to be read. The operating system will then load (part of the) embedding matrix a by-need basis. The operating system can additionally free up the memory again when no embeddings are looked up and other processes require memory.
The following empirical comparison of embedding types uses an embedding matrix with 2,807,440 embeddings (710,288 word, 2,097,152 subword) of dimensionality 300. The embedding lookup timings were done on an Intel Core i5-8259U CPU, 2.30GHz.
Known lookup and Unknown lookup time lookups of words that are inside/outside the vocabulary. Lookup contains a mixture of known and unknown words.
Storage | Lookup | Known lookup | Unknown lookup | Memory | Disk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
array | 449 ns | 232 ns | 18 μs | 3213 MiB | 3213 MiB |
array mmap | 833 ns | 494 ns | 23 μs | Variable | 3213 MiB |
opq | 40 μs | 21 μs | 962 μs | 402 MiB | 402 MiB |
opq mmap | 41 μs | 21 μs | 960 μs | Variable | 402 MiB |
Note: two units are used: nanoseconds (ns) and microseconds (μs).
If you are using finalfusion
in a binary crate, you can compile
ndarray
with BLAS support to speed up certain functionality in
finalfusion-rust
. In order to do so, enable the ndarray/blas
feature and add one of the following crates as a dependency to select
a BLAS/LAPACK implementation:
netlib-src
: Use reference BLAS/LAPACK (slow, not recommended)openblas-src
: Use OpenBLASintel-mkl-src
: Use Intel Math Kernel LibraryIf you want to quantize an embedding matrix using optimized product
quantization, you must enable the the reductive/opq-train
feature
in addition to adding a BLAS/LAPACK implementation.
The
Cargo.toml
file of finalfusion-utils
can be used as an example of how to use
BLAS in a binary crate.
Embedding lookups in embedding matrices that were quantized using the optimized product quantizer can be speeded up using a good BLAS implementation. The following table compares lookup times on an Intel Core i5-8259U CPU, 2.30GHz with finalfusion compiled with and without MKL/OpenBLAS support:
Storage | Lookup | Known lookup | Unknown lookup |
---|---|---|---|
opq | 40 μs | 21 μs | 962 μs |
opq mmap | 41 μs | 21 μs | 960 μs |
opq (MKL) | 14 μs | 7 μs | 309 μs |
opq mmap (MKL) | 14 μs | 7 μs | 309 μs |
opq (OpenBLAS) | 15 μs | 7 μs | 336 μs |
opq mmap (OpenBLAS) | 15 μs | 7 μs | 342 μs |