Crates.io | fn_graph |
lib.rs | fn_graph |
version | 0.13.3 |
source | src |
created_at | 2021-12-11 05:27:43.895078 |
updated_at | 2024-08-31 10:48:08.472483 |
description | Dynamically managed function graph execution. |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/azriel91/fn_graph |
max_upload_size | |
id | 496123 |
size | 311,032 |
Dynamically managed function graph execution.
This crate provides a FnGraph
, where consumers can register a list of
functions and their interdependencies. The graph can then return a stream of
functions to iterate over either sequentially or concurrently. Any data
dependencies required by the functions are guaranteed to not conflict
according to borrowing rules.
There is additional flexibility that the type of functions is not limited to
closures and functions, but any type that implements the FnRes
and
FnMeta
traits.
Add the following to Cargo.toml
fn_graph = "0.13.3"
# Integrate with `fn_meta` / `interruptible` / `resman`
fn_graph = { version = "0.13.3", features = ["fn_meta"] }
fn_graph = { version = "0.13.3", features = ["interruptible"] }
fn_graph = { version = "0.13.3", features = ["resman"] }
fn_graph = { version = "0.13.3", features = ["fn_meta", "interruptible", "resman"] }
Suppose there are three tasks, each represented by a function. Each function needs different data:
Function | Data |
---|---|
f1 |
&a, &b |
f2 |
&a, &b, &mut c |
f3 |
&mut a, &b, &mut c |
When scheduling parallel execution, it is valid to execute f1
and f2
in
parallel, since data a
and b
are accessed immutably, and c
is
exclusively accessed by b
. f3
cannot be executed in parallel with f1
or f2
as it requires exclusive access to both a
and c
.
For a small number of functions and data, manually writing code to schedule function execution is manageable. However, as the number of functions and data increases, so does its complexity, and it is desirable for this boilerplate to be managed by code.
The concept of a runtime managed data-dependency task graph is from
shred
; fn_graph
's implementation has the following differences:
Different API ergonomics and flexibility trade-offs.
Takes functions and closures as input instead of System
impls.
Parameters are detected from function signature instead of
SystemData
implementation, but with a limit of 8 parameters.
(manual SystemData
implementation has arbitrary limit)
Return type is type parameterized instead of ()
.
Instead of grouping functions by stages to manage data access conflicts,
fn_graph
keeps a dependency graph of logic and data dependencies, and
executes functions when the preceding functions are complete.
This allows for slightly less waiting time for subsequent functions with data dependencies, as each may begin once its predecessors finish, whereas a staged approach may contain other functions that are still executing that prevent functions in the next stage from beginning execution.
fn_meta
: Returns metadata about a function at runtime.interruptible
: Support for interruptible streams.resman
: Runtime managed resource borrowing.shred
: Shared resource dispatcher.Licensed under either of
at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.