Crates.io | indicium |
lib.rs | indicium |
version | |
source | src |
created_at | 2021-09-06 02:43:37.984002 |
updated_at | 2024-10-20 00:04:12.134251 |
description | Simple in-memory search for collections and key-value stores. |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/leontoeides/indicium |
max_upload_size | |
id | 447373 |
Cargo.toml error: | TOML parse error at line 20, column 1 | 20 | autolib = false | ^^^^^^^ unknown field `autolib`, expected one of `name`, `version`, `edition`, `authors`, `description`, `readme`, `license`, `repository`, `homepage`, `documentation`, `build`, `resolver`, `links`, `default-run`, `default_dash_run`, `rust-version`, `rust_dash_version`, `rust_version`, `license-file`, `license_dash_file`, `license_file`, `licenseFile`, `license_capital_file`, `forced-target`, `forced_dash_target`, `autobins`, `autotests`, `autoexamples`, `autobenches`, `publish`, `metadata`, `keywords`, `categories`, `exclude`, `include` |
size | 0 |
A simple in-memory search for collections (Vec
, HashMap
, BTreeMap
, etc.)
and key-value stores. Features autocompletion and fuzzy matching.
There are many incredible search engines available for Rust. Many seem to
require compiling a separate server binary. I wanted something simple and
light-weight - an easy-to-use crate that could conveniently search structs and
collections within my own binary. So, I made indicium
.
While indicium
was made with web apps in mind, it is an in-memory search and
it does not scale indefinitely or to cloud size (i.e. Facebook or Google size).
Even in such an environment, it would still be a convenient way of searching
large lists (such as currencies, languages, countries, etc.) It's also great for
applications where there is an anticipated scale limit (i.e. searching a list of
company assets, list of users in a corporate intranet, etc.)
Indicium easily can handle millions of records without breaking a sweat thanks to Rust's BTreeMap. This crate is primarily limited by available memory. However, depending on the nature your data-set and if there are keywords that are repeated many times, performance may begin to degrade at a point.
Configure the dependencies in your project's Cargo.toml
file:
[dependencies]
indicium = "0.6"
Release notes are available on GitHub.
The full change log is available on GitHub.
For our Quick Start Guide example, we will be searching inside of the
following struct
:
struct MyStruct {
title: String,
year: u16,
body: String,
}
To begin, we must make our record indexable. We'll do this by implementing the
Indexable
trait for our struct
. The idea is to return a String
for every
field that we would like to be indexed. Example:
use indicium::simple::Indexable;
impl Indexable for MyStruct {
fn strings(&self) -> Vec<String> {
vec![
self.title.clone(),
self.year.to_string(),
self.body.clone(),
]
}
}
Don't forget that you may make numbers, numeric identifiers, enums, and other
types in your struct
(or other complex types) indexable by converting them to
a String
and including them in the returned Vec<String>
.
To index an existing collection, we can iterate over the collection. For each record, we will insert it into the search index. This should look something like these two examples:
use indicium::simple::SearchIndex;
let my_vec: Vec<MyStruct> = Vec::new();
// In the case of a `Vec` collection, we use the index as our key. A
// `Vec` index is a `usize` type. Therefore we will instantiate
// `SearchIndex` as `SearchIndex<usize>`.
let mut search_index: SearchIndex<usize> = SearchIndex::default();
my_vec
.iter()
.enumerate()
.for_each(|(index, element)|
search_index.insert(&index, element)
);
use std::collections::HashMap;
use indicium::simple::SearchIndex;
let my_hash_map: HashMap<String, MyStruct> = HashMap::new();
// In the case of a `HashMap` collection, we use the hash map's key as
// the `SearchIndex` key. In our hypothetical example, we will use
// MyStruct's `title` as a the key which is a `String` type. Therefore
// we will instantiate `HashMap<K, V>` as HashMap<String, MyStruct> and
// `SearchIndex<K>` as `SearchIndex<String>`.
let mut search_index: SearchIndex<String> = SearchIndex::default();
my_hash_map
.iter()
.for_each(|(key, value)|
search_index.insert(key, value)
);
As long as the Indexable
trait was implemented for your value type, the above
examples will index a previously populated Vec
or HashMap
. However, the
preferred method for large collections is to insert
into the SearchIndex
as
you insert into your collection (Vec, HashMap, etc.)
It's recommended to wrap your target collection (your Vec
, HashMap
, etc.)
and this SearchIndex
together in a new struct
type. Then, implement the
insert
, replace
, remove
, etc. methods for this new struct
type that will
update both the collection and search index. This will ensure that both your
collection and index are always synchronized.
Once the index has been populated, you can use the search
and autocomplete
methods.
The search
method will return keys as the search results. Each resulting
key can then be used to retrieve the full record from its collection.
Basic usage:
let mut search_index: SearchIndex<usize> = SearchIndex::default();
search_index.insert(&0, &"Harold Godwinson");
search_index.insert(&1, &"Edgar Ætheling");
search_index.insert(&2, &"William the Conqueror");
search_index.insert(&3, &"William Rufus");
search_index.insert(&4, &"Henry Beauclerc");
let resulting_keys: Vec<&usize> = search_index.search("William");
assert_eq!(resulting_keys, vec![&2, &3]);
// Demonstrating fuzzy matching:
let resulting_keys: Vec<&usize> = search_index.search("Harry");
assert_eq!(resulting_keys, vec![&0]);
Search only supports exact keyword matches. For Live
searches, fuzzy matching
is only applied to the last keyword. Consider providing the autocomplete
feature to your users as an ergonomic alternative to fuzzy matching.
The autocomplete
method will provide several autocompletion options for the
last keyword in the supplied string.
Basic usage:
let mut search_index: SearchIndex<usize> =
SearchIndexBuilder::default()
.autocomplete_type(&AutocompleteType::Global)
.build();
search_index.insert(&0, &"apple");
search_index.insert(&1, &"ball");
search_index.insert(&3, &"bird");
search_index.insert(&4, &"birthday");
search_index.insert(&5, &"red");
let autocomplete_options: Vec<String> =
search_index.autocomplete("a very big bi");
assert_eq!(
autocomplete_options,
vec!["a very big bird", "a very big birthday"]
);
// Demonstrating fuzzy matching:
let autocomplete_options: Vec<String> =
search_index.autocomplete("a very big birf");
assert_eq!(
autocomplete_options,
vec!["a very big bird", "a very big birthday"]
);
This crate is passively maintained. This crate does what it's expected to do and does it pretty well, in my opinion. Frequent updates are not expected.