Crates.io | inherit-methods-macro |
lib.rs | inherit-methods-macro |
version | 0.1.0 |
source | src |
created_at | 2024-07-01 08:15:46.406928 |
updated_at | 2024-07-01 08:15:46.406928 |
description | Inherit methods from a field automatically (via procedural macros) |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/asterinas/inherit-methods-macro |
max_upload_size | |
id | 1288545 |
size | 19,499 |
Inherit methods from a field automatically (via procedural macros).
While Rust is partially inspired by the object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigm and has some typical OOP features (like objects, encapsulation, and polymorphism), it is not an OOP language. One piece of evidence is the lack of inheritance, which an important pillar of OOP. But don't take me wrong: this lack of inheritance is actually a good thing since it promotes the practice of composition over inheritance in Rust programs. Despite all the benefits of composition, Rust programmers have to write trivial fowarding methods, which is a tedious task, especially when you have to write many of them.
To address this pain point of using composition in Rust, the crate provides a convenient procedure macro that generates forwarding methods automatically for you. In other words, your structs can now "inherit" methods from their fields, enjoying the best of both worlds: the convenience of inheritance and the flexibility of composition.
Suppose that you want to create a new struct named Stack<T>
, which can be implemented by
simply wrapping around Vec<T>
and exposing only a subset of the APIs of Vec
. Here is
how this crate can help you do it easily.
use inherit_methods_macro::inherit_methods;
pub struct Stack<T>(Vec<T>);
// Annotate an impl block with #[inherit_methods(from = "...")] to enable automatically
// inheriting methods from a field, which is specifiedd by the from attribute.
#[inherit_methods(from = "self.0")]
impl<T> Stack<T> {
// Normal methods can be implemented with inherited methods in the same impl block.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self(Vec::new())
}
// All methods without code blocks will "inherit" the implementation of Vec by
// forwarding their method calls to self.0.
pub fn push(&mut self, value: T);
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
pub fn len(&self) -> usize;
}
If you want to derive common traits (like AsRef
and Deref
) for a wrapper type, check out
the shrinkwraprs crate.
In many OOP frameworks or applications, it is useful to have a base class from which all objects
inherit. In this example, we would like to do the same thing, creating a base class
(the Object
trait for the interface and the ObjectBase
struct for the implementation).
that all objects should "inherit".
use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicU64, Ordering};
use std::sync::Mutex;
use inherit_methods_macro::inherit_methods;
pub trait Object {
fn type_name(&self) -> &'static str;
fn object_id(&self) -> u64;
fn name(&self) -> String;
fn set_name(&self, new_name: String);
}
struct ObjectBase {
object_id: u64,
name: Mutex<String>,
}
impl ObjectBase {
pub fn new() -> Self {
static NEXT_ID: AtomicU64 = AtomicU64::new(0);
Self {
object_id: NEXT_ID.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed),
name: Mutex::new(String::new()),
}
}
pub fn object_id(&self) -> u64 {
self.object_id
}
pub fn name(&self) -> String {
self.name.lock().unwrap().clone()
}
pub fn set_name(&self, new_name: String) {
*self.name.lock().unwrap() = new_name;
}
}
struct DummyObject {
base: ObjectBase,
}
impl DummyObject {
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
base: ObjectBase::new(),
}
}
}
#[inherit_methods(from = "self.base")]
impl Object for DummyObject {
// Give this method an implementation specific to this type
fn type_name(&self) -> &'static str {
"DummyObject"
}
// Inherit methods from the base class
fn object_id(&self) -> u64;
fn name(&self) -> String;
fn set_name(&self, new_name: String);
}