Crates.io | ndsparse |
lib.rs | ndsparse |
version | 0.8.1 |
source | src |
created_at | 2020-03-02 01:05:40.457415 |
updated_at | 2021-07-24 12:55:52.830216 |
description | Sparse structures for N-dimensions |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/c410-f3r/ndsparse/ |
max_upload_size | |
id | 214337 |
size | 86,364 |
Structures to store and retrieve N-dimensional sparse data. Well, not any N ∈ ℕ
but any natural number that fits into the pointer size of the machine that you are using. E.g., an 8-bit microcontroller can manipulate any sparse structure with up to 255 dimensions.
For those that might be wondering about why this crate should be used, it generally comes down to space-efficiency, ergometrics and retrieving speed. The following snippet shows some use-cases for potential replacement with _cube_of_vecs
being the most inefficient of all.
let _vec_of_options: Vec<Option<i32>> = Default::default();
let _matrix_of_options: [Option<[Option<i32>; 8]>; 16] = Default::default();
let _cube_of_vecs: Vec<Vec<Vec<i32>>> = Default::default();
// The list worsens exponentially for higher dimensions
See this blog post for more information.
use ndsparse::{coo::CooArray, csl::CslVec};
fn main() -> ndsparse::Result<()> {
// A CSL and COO cube.
//
// ___ ___
// / / /\
// /___/___/ /\
// / 1 / /\/2/
// /_1_/___/ /\/
// \_1_\___\/ /
// \___\___\/
let coo = CooArray::new([2, 2, 2], [([0, 0, 0], 1.0), ([1, 1, 1], 2.0)])?;
let mut csl = CslVec::default();
csl
.constructor()?
.next_outermost_dim(2)?
.push_line([(0, 1.0)].iter().copied())?
.next_outermost_dim(2)?
.push_empty_line()?
.next_outermost_dim(2)?
.push_empty_line()?
.push_line([(1, 2.0)].iter().copied())?;
assert_eq!(coo.value([0, 0, 0]), csl.value([0, 0, 0]));
assert_eq!(coo.value([1, 1, 1]), csl.value([1, 1, 1]));
Ok(())
}
no_std
w/o opt-out flagsalloc
and std
Although CSR and COO are general sparse structures, they aren't good enough for certain situations, therefore, the existence of DIA, JDS, ELL, LIL, DOK and many others.
If there are enough interest, the mentioned sparse storages might be added at some point in the future.
This project isn't and will never be a sparse algebra library because of its own self-contained responsibility and complexity. Futhermore, a good implementation of such library would require a titanic amount of work and research for different algorithms, operations, decompositions, solvers and hardwares.
One of these libraries might suit you better: