Crates.io | nom-parse-trait |
lib.rs | nom-parse-trait |
version | |
source | src |
created_at | 2025-01-03 13:48:40.902225 |
updated_at | 2025-01-08 14:28:17.838334 |
description | Adding traits to make parsing types easier |
homepage | https://github.com/marcdejonge/nom-parse-trait |
repository | https://github.com/marcdejonge/nom-parse-trait.git |
max_upload_size | |
id | 1502426 |
Cargo.toml error: | TOML parse error at line 23, column 1 | 23 | autolib = false | ^^^^^^^ unknown field `autolib`, expected one of `name`, `version`, `edition`, `authors`, `description`, `readme`, `license`, `repository`, `homepage`, `documentation`, `build`, `resolver`, `links`, `default-run`, `default_dash_run`, `rust-version`, `rust_dash_version`, `rust_version`, `license-file`, `license_dash_file`, `license_file`, `licenseFile`, `license_capital_file`, `forced-target`, `forced_dash_target`, `autobins`, `autotests`, `autoexamples`, `autobenches`, `publish`, `metadata`, `keywords`, `categories`, `exclude`, `include` |
size | 0 |
This is an extension to the popular nom crate, that provides a ParseFrom
trait that can be implemented on any data that can be parsed in a singular way.
This means it should have a parse
function available and the signature of
that function is compatible with the nom::Parser
trait.
The ParseFrom
trait is generic over the input type, which means that you can
define it generically over any input type that nom supports. The downside of this
is that you will need a bunch of restrictions to the input type in a where
block.
Also, using a generic parser implementation can be more annoying to use, since in
some cases Rust can't infer the type of the input or error. See the
generic_input example for an example of this.
If you already know what types of input and error you are going to use in the program, using a specific implementation can be more convenient. See the simple example for an example of this.
There are a couple of default implementations provided by this library. Since for these
standard types you cannot implement ParseFrom
outside of this library, there are
choices made for the parsing of these types. Mostly these are for text-based parsing.
If you want your own implementation, you can wrap the type in a struct and implement
ParseFrom
for that struct.
It provides a ParseFrom
implementation for a couple of primitive numbers, based on
normal text parsing (e.g. the string "123" will be parsed to the number 123).
i16
i32
i64
i128
u16
u32
u64
u128
Also, the bool
type has a default implementation, where it will parse the string
"true" to true
and "false" to false
.
Vec<T>
A default implementation for VecParseFrom
, where it uses the nom::character::complete::line_ending
parser
to separate the elements.
HashMap<T, S>
Similar to the Vec<T>
implementation, you can also use a HashSet directly.
HashMap<K, V, S>
A default implementation for HashMap<K, V>
has been provided, as long as K and V
implement ParseFrom
. It uses the nom::character::complete::line_ending
parser
to separate the key-value pairs and separates the key and value with an equals sign (=).
Licensed under either of
at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.