Most economists rely on the oaxaca R package or statsmodels in Python. While excellent, they have limitations that this library addresses:

1. 🚀 Speed: Written in Rust with parallelized bootstrapping (Rayon). It is 20-30x faster than R and 10x faster than Python for large datasets (see Benchmarks).
2. 📦 All-in-One Toolkit: In R, you need oaxaca for decomposition, rifreg for quantiles, MatchIt for matching, and lfe for AKM. In Python, statsmodels lacks built-in RIF, Matching, and AKM. This library unifies all of them into a single, consistent API.
3. 🛡️ Type Safety: Rust's strict type system prevents common data errors (like silent NaN propagation) that can plague dynamic languages.
4. 🧠 Unique Features: Includes the "Cheapest Fix" budget optimization solver, a tool specifically designed for HR departments to close pay gaps efficiently—something no other standard library offers.
5. 🐍 Python & CLI Support: You don't need to know Rust. Use the high-performance engine directly from Python or the command line.
6. ⚡ Parallelized Inference: Bootstrapping standard errors for Oaxaca decompositions is computationally intensive. This library uses Rayon to parallelize this across all CPU cores, reducing wait times from minutes to seconds.

Don't want to write Rust code? You can use the oaxaca-cli tool directly from your terminal to analyze CSV files.

Installation

cargo install oaxaca_blinder --features cli

Usage

Basic Decomposition:

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --outcome wage --group gender --reference F \
    --predictors education experience --categorical sector

Using R-style Formula:

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --group gender --reference F \
    --formula "wage ~ education + experience + C(sector)"

With Sample Weights (WLS):

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --outcome wage --group gender --reference F \
    --predictors education experience \
    --weights sampling_weight

With Heckman Correction (Selection Bias):

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --outcome wage --group gender --reference F \
    --predictors education experience \
    --selection-outcome employed \
    --selection-predictors education experience age marital_status

Export Results:

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv ... --output-json results.json --output-markdown report.md

Supports both --analysis-type mean (default) and --analysis-type quantile.

Add to Cargo.toml:

[dependencies]
oaxaca_blinder = "0.1.0"
polars = { version = "0.38", features = ["lazy", "csv"] }

Basic OLS Decomposition

use polars::prelude::*;
use oaxaca_blinder::{OaxacaBuilder, ReferenceCoefficients};

fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
    let df = df!(
        "wage" => &[25.0, 30.0, 35.0, 40.0, 45.0, 20.0, 22.0, 28.0, 32.0, 38.0],
        "education" => &[16.0, 18.0, 14.0, 20.0, 16.0, 12.0, 14.0, 16.0, 12.0, 18.0],
        "gender" => &["M", "M", "M", "M", "M", "F", "F", "F", "F", "F"]
    )?;

    let results = OaxacaBuilder::new(df, "wage", "gender", "F")
        .predictors(&["education"])
        .reference_coefficients(ReferenceCoefficients::Pooled)
        .run()?;

    results.summary();
    Ok(())
}

Python Example

import oaxaca_blinder

results = oaxaca_blinder.decompose_from_csv(
    "wage.csv",
    outcome="wage",
    predictors=["education", "experience"],
    categorical_predictors=["sector"],
    group="gender",
    reference_group="F",
    bootstrap_reps=100
)

print(f"Total Gap: {results.total_gap}")
print(f"Unexplained: {results.unexplained}")

"The Cheapest Fix"

This unique feature is designed for HR analytics. It answers: "Given a limited budget, how can we reduce the pay gap as much as possible?"

It identifies individuals in the disadvantaged group with the largest negative unexplained residuals (i.e., the most "underpaid" relative to their qualifications) and calculates the optimal raises.

// Scenario: You have $200,000 to reduce the gap to 5%
let adjustments = results.optimize_budget(200_000.0, 0.05);

for adj in adjustments {
    println!("Give ${:.2} raise to employee #{}", adj.adjustment, adj.index);
}

The library supports two robust methods for decomposing the wage gap across the distribution:

Example: RIF Decomposition

// Fast decomposition of the 90th percentile gap
let results = OaxacaBuilder::new(df, "wage", "gender", "F")
    .predictors(&["education", "experience"])
    .decompose_quantile(0.9)?;

CLI Example

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --outcome wage --group gender --reference F \
    --predictors education experience \
    --analysis-type quantile --quantiles 0.1,0.5,0.9

Note: Python bindings for quantile decomposition are coming soon.

DiNardo-Fortin-Lemieux (DFL) reweighting (Rust Only) is a non-parametric alternative that allows you to visualize what the wage distribution of Group B would look like if they had the characteristics of Group A.

The run_dfl function returns density vectors perfect for plotting in Python (matplotlib) or Rust (plotters).

use oaxaca_blinder::run_dfl;

let dfl = run_dfl(&df, "wage", "gender", "F", &["education", "experience"])?;

// dfl.grid                   <- X-axis (Wage levels)
// dfl.density_a              <- Actual Group A Density
// dfl.density_b              <- Actual Group B Density
// dfl.density_b_counterfactual <- "What B would earn with A's characteristics"

Tip: Plot density_b vs density_b_counterfactual to visualize the "explained" gap.

Designed for performance, utilizing Rust's speed and parallelization (Rayon) for bootstrapping.

Performance vs Python (statsmodels) vs R (oaxaca) Dataset: 100k rows, 10 predictors

Rust's raw decomposition is significantly faster than statsmodels, and the bootstrap performance is orders of magnitude faster than R.

The library includes a high-performance Matching Engine for causal inference, supporting Euclidean, Mahalanobis, and Propensity Score Matching (PSM).

Rust Example

use oaxaca_blinder::MatchingEngine;
use polars::prelude::*;

// Load data...
let engine = MatchingEngine::new(df, "treatment", "outcome", &["age", "education"]);

// 1-Nearest Neighbor Matching with Mahalanobis distance
let weights = engine.run_matching(1, true)?;

Python Example

import oaxaca_blinder

# Match units
weights = oaxaca_blinder.match_units(
    "data.csv",
    treatment="treatment",
    outcome="wage",
    covariates=["education", "experience"],
    k=1,
    method="mahalanobis" # or "euclidean", "psm"
)

CLI Example

oaxaca-cli --data wage.csv --outcome wage --group treatment --reference 0 \
  --predictors education,experience \
  --analysis-type match --matching-method mahalanobis --k-neighbors 1

The decomposition depends on the choice of the non-discriminatory coefficient vector $\beta^*$. The general decomposition equation is:

This library supports:

• Group A / Group B: Uses $\beta_A$ or $\beta_B$ as the reference.
• Pooled (Neumark): Uses $\beta^*$ from a pooled regression of both groups.
• Weighted (Cotton): Uses a weighted average: $\beta^* = w\beta_A + (1-w)\beta_B$.

Standard detailed decomposition is sensitive to the choice of the omitted base category for dummy variables. This library implements Yun's normalization, which transforms coefficients to be invariant to the base category choice:

Where $\bar{\beta}_k$ is the mean of the coefficients for the categorical variable $k$. This ensures robust detailed results.

The Juhn-Murphy-Pierce (JMP) method decomposes the change in the gap over time (or between distributions) into three components:

1. Quantity Effect: Changes in observable characteristics ($X$).
2. Price Effect: Changes in returns to characteristics ($\beta$).
3. Gap Effect: Changes in the distribution of unobserved residuals.

The AKM model decomposes wage variation into individual and firm-specific components:

• $\alpha_i$: Person fixed effect (unobserved ability).
• $\psi_{J(i,t)}$: Firm fixed effect (pay premium).
• $x_{it}$: Time-varying covariates.

Identification: The model is identified only within the Largest Connected Set (LCS) of workers and firms linked by mobility. This library automatically extracts the LCS using a graph-based approach (BFS) before estimation.

PSM estimates the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) by matching treated units to control units with similar probabilities of treatment:

1. Propensity Score: $e(x) = P(D=1|X=x)$ estimated via Logistic Regression.
2. Matching: Nearest Neighbor matching on the logit of the propensity score.
3. Balance: Ensures that the distribution of covariates is similar between treated and matched control groups.

DiNardo, Fortin, and Lemieux (1996) proposed a non-parametric method to decompose the entire distribution of wages. It constructs a counterfactual density for Group B (e.g., women) as if they had the characteristics of Group A (e.g., men) by applying a reweighting factor $\Psi(x)$:

• $P(A|x)$: Probability of belonging to Group A given characteristics $x$ (estimated via Probit/Logit).
• $\Psi(x)$: The weight applied to each observation in Group B.

This allows for visual comparison of the "explained" gap across the entire distribution (e.g., via Kernel Density Estimation).