Crates.io | pushgen |
lib.rs | pushgen |
version | 0.0.2 |
source | src |
created_at | 2021-06-29 11:35:30.656332 |
updated_at | 2021-08-02 11:48:23.557203 |
description | Push-style design pattern for processing of ranges and data-streams. |
homepage | https://github.com/AndWass/pushgen |
repository | https://github.com/AndWass/pushgen |
max_upload_size | |
id | 416126 |
size | 232,097 |
Push-style design pattern for processing of ranges and data-streams.
This is a Rust-based approach to the design pattern described by transrangers.
While the discussion linked targets C++, the same basic principle of pull-based iterators applies
to Rust as well (with some modifications since Rust doesn't have a concept of an end
iterator
like C++ does).
fn process(x: i32) { /*...*/ }
let data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
for item in data.iter().filter(|x| *x % 2 == 0).map(|x| x * 3) {
process(item);
}
can be rewritten as
use pushgen::{SliceGenerator, GeneratorExt};
fn process(_x: i32) { /*...*/ }
let data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
SliceGenerator::new(&data).filter(|x| *x % 2 == 0).map(|x| x * 3).for_each(process);
I make no performance-claims, however there are some benchmarked cases where the push-based approach wins over the iterator approach, but I have made no attempts to analyze this in any depth.