C API for RUst's REgex engine

rure is a C API to Rust's regex library, which guarantees linear time searching using finite automata. In exchange, it must give up some common regex features such as backreferences and arbitrary lookaround. It does however include capturing groups, lazy matching, Unicode support and word boundary assertions. Its matching semantics generally correspond to Perl's, or "leftmost first." Namely, the match locations reported correspond to the first match that would be found by a backtracking engine.

The header file (includes/rure.h) serves as the primary API documentation of this library. Types and flags are documented first, and functions follow.

The syntax and possibly other useful things are documented in the Rust API documentation: https://docs.rs/regex

Examples

There are readable examples in the ctest and examples sub-directories.

Assuming you have Rust and Cargo installed (and a C compiler), then this should work to run the iter example:

$ git clone git://github.com/rust-lang/regex
$ cd regex/regex-capi/examples
$ ./compile
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../target/release ./iter

Performance

It's fast. Its core matching engine is a lazy DFA, which is what GNU grep and RE2 use. Like GNU grep, this regex engine can detect multi byte literals in the regex and will use fast literal string searching to quickly skip through the input to find possible match locations.

All memory usage is bounded and all searching takes linear time with respect to the input string.

For more details, see the PERFORMANCE guide: https://github.com/rust-lang/regex/blob/master/PERFORMANCE.md

Text encoding

All regular expressions must be valid UTF-8.

The text encoding of haystacks is more complicated. To a first approximation, haystacks should be UTF-8. In fact, UTF-8 (and, one supposes, ASCII) is the only well defined text encoding supported by this library. It is impossible to match UTF-16, UTF-32 or any other encoding without first transcoding it to UTF-8.

With that said, haystacks do not need to be valid UTF-8, and if they aren't valid UTF-8, no performance penalty is paid. Whether invalid UTF-8 is matched or not depends on the regular expression. For example, with the RURE_FLAG_UNICODE flag enabled, the regex . is guaranteed to match a single UTF-8 encoding of a Unicode codepoint (sans LF). In particular, it will not match invalid UTF-8 such as \xFF, nor will it match surrogate codepoints or "alternate" (i.e., non-minimal) encodings of codepoints. However, with the RURE_FLAG_UNICODE flag disabled, the regex . will match any single arbitrary byte (sans LF), including \xFF.

This provides a useful invariant: wherever RURE_FLAG_UNICODE is set, the corresponding regex is guaranteed to match valid UTF-8. Invalid UTF-8 will always prevent a match from happening when the flag is set. Since flags can be toggled in the regular expression itself, this allows one to pick and choose which parts of the regular expression must match UTF-8 or not.

Some good advice is to always enable the RURE_FLAG_UNICODE flag (which is enabled when using rure_compile_must) and selectively disable the flag when one wants to match arbitrary bytes. The flag can be disabled in a regular expression with (?-u).

Finally, if one wants to match specific invalid UTF-8 bytes, then you can use escape sequences. e.g., (?-u)\\xFF will match \xFF. It's not possible to use C literal escape sequences in this case since regular expressions must be valid UTF-8.

Aborts

This library will abort your process if an unwinding panic is caught in the Rust code. Generally, a panic occurs when there is a bug in the program or if allocation failed. It is possible to cause this behavior by passing invalid inputs to some functions. For example, giving an invalid capture group index to rure_captures_at will cause Rust's bounds checks to fail, which will cause a panic, which will be caught and printed to stderr. The process will then abort.

Missing

There are a few things missing from the C API that are present in the Rust API. There's no particular (known) reason why they don't, they just haven't been implemented yet.

• Splitting a string by a regex.
• Replacing regex matches in a string with some other text.