Crates.io | stm |
lib.rs | stm |
version | 0.4.0 |
source | src |
created_at | 2015-09-17 15:50:35.07362 |
updated_at | 2018-03-29 10:21:36.330465 |
description | Implementation of Software transactional memory. Allows composable atomic operations. |
homepage | https://github.com/Marthog/rust-stm |
repository | https://github.com/Marthog/rust-stm |
max_upload_size | |
id | 3062 |
size | 26,817 |
This library implements software transactional memory, often abbreviated with STM.
It is designed closely to haskells STM library. Read Simon Marlow's Parallel and Concurrent Programming in Haskell for more info. Especially the chapter about Performance is also important for using STM in rust.
With locks the sequential composition of two two threadsafe actions is no longer threadsafe because other threads may interfer in between of these actions. Applying a third lock to protect both may lead to common sources of errors like deadlocks or race conditions.
Unlike locks Software transactional memory is composable.
It is typically implemented by writing all read and write
operations in a log. When the action has finished and
all the used TVar
s are consistend, the writes are commited as
a single atomic operation.
Otherwise the computation repeats. This may lead to starvation,
but avoids common sources of bugs.
Panicing within STM does not poison the TVar
s. STM ensures consistency by
never committing on panic.
You should only use the functions that are safe to use.
Don't have side effects except for the atomic variables, from this library. Especially a mutex or other blocking mechanisms inside of software transactional memory is dangerous.
You can run the top-level atomic operation by calling atomically
.
use stm::atomically;
atomically(|trans| {
// some action
// return value as `Result`, for example
Ok(42)
});
Calls to atomically
should not be nested.
For running an atomic operation inside of another, pass a mutable reference to a Transaction
and call try!
on the result or use ?
. You should not handle the error yourself, because it
breaks consistency.
use stm::{atomically, TVar};
let var = TVar::new(0);
let x = atomically(|trans| {
var.write(trans, 42)?; // Pass failure to parent.
var.read(trans) // Return the value saved in var.
});
println!("var = {}", x);
Software transactional memory is completely safe in the terms, that rust considers safe. Still there are multiple rules that you should obey when dealing with software transactional memory:
Transaction::or
, to combine alternative paths. Always call try!
or
?
and never ignore a StmResult
.atomically
inside of another. atomically
is designed to have side effects
and will therefore break stm's assumptions. Nested calls are detected at runtime and
handled with panic.
When you use STM in the inner of a function, then
express it in the public interface, by taking &mut Transaction
as parameter and
returning StmResult<T>
. Callers can safely compose it into
larger blocks.TVar
.Generally keep your atomic blocks as small as possible, because
the more time you spend, the more likely it is, to collide with
other threads. For STM, reading TVar
s is quite slow, because it
needs to look them up in the log every time.
Every used TVar
increases the chance of collisions. Therefore you should
keep the amount of accessed variables as low as needed.
Licensed under either of
at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.