Crates.io | substrate-benchmark-machine |
lib.rs | substrate-benchmark-machine |
version | |
source | src |
created_at | 2023-03-25 18:17:08.742675 |
updated_at | 2024-12-08 03:35:22.028077 |
description | CLI for benchmarking substrate validator node |
homepage | https://substrate.io |
repository | https://github.com/paritytech/substrate/ |
max_upload_size | |
id | 820439 |
Cargo.toml error: | TOML parse error at line 18, column 1 | 18 | autolib = false | ^^^^^^^ unknown field `autolib`, expected one of `name`, `version`, `edition`, `authors`, `description`, `readme`, `license`, `repository`, `homepage`, `documentation`, `build`, `resolver`, `links`, `default-run`, `default_dash_run`, `rust-version`, `rust_dash_version`, `rust_version`, `license-file`, `license_dash_file`, `license_file`, `licenseFile`, `license_capital_file`, `forced-target`, `forced_dash_target`, `autobins`, `autotests`, `autoexamples`, `autobenches`, `publish`, `metadata`, `keywords`, `categories`, `exclude`, `include` |
size | 0 |
Different Substrate chains can have different hardware requirements.
It is therefore important to be able to quickly gauge if a piece of hardware
fits a chains' requirements.
The substrate-benchmark-machine
command archives this by measuring key metrics
and making them comparable.
Installing the command looks like this:
cargo install --git https://github.com/btwiuse/substrate-benchmark-machine
Perform quick hardware check:
$ substrate-benchmark-machine
[INFO] Performing quick hardware check...
[INFO] 🏁 CPU score: 1.42 GiBs (✅ Blake2256: expected minimum 1.00 GiBs)
[INFO] 🏁 Memory score: 17.93 GiBs (✅ MemCopy: expected minimum 14.32 GiBs)
[INFO] 🏁 Disk score (seq. writes): 397.35 MiBs (❌ DiskSeqWrite: expected minimum 450.00 MiBs)
[INFO] 🏁 Disk score (rand. writes): 193.44 MiBs (❌ DiskRndWrite: expected minimum 200.00 MiBs)
[INFO] ⚠ The hardware does not meet the minimal requirements for role 'Authority'.
Run full benchmarks:
$ substrate-benchmark-machine --full
[INFO] Running full machine benchmarks...
[INFO]
+----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------+
| Category | Function | Score | Minimum | Result |
+===========================================================================+
| CPU | BLAKE2-256 | 1.42 GiBs | 1.00 GiBs | ✅ Pass (141.3 %) |
|----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------|
| CPU | SR25519-Verify | 726.21 KiBs | 666.00 KiBs | ✅ Pass (109.0 %) |
|----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------|
| Memory | Copy | 18.10 GiBs | 14.32 GiBs | ✅ Pass (126.4 %) |
|----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------|
| Disk | Seq Write | 398.56 MiBs | 450.00 MiBs | ❌ Fail ( 88.6 %) |
|----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------|
| Disk | Rnd Write | 193.37 MiBs | 200.00 MiBs | ✅ Pass ( 96.7 %) |
+----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+-------------------+
From 5 benchmarks in total, 4 passed and 1 failed (10% fault tolerance).
[INFO] The hardware fails to meet the requirements
Error: One of the benchmarks had a score that was lower than its requirement
The score is the average result of each benchmark. It always adheres to "higher is better".
The category indicate which part of the hardware was benchmarked:
The function is the concrete benchmark that was run:
The score needs to reach the minimum in order to pass the benchmark. This
can be reduced with the --tolerance
flag.
The result indicated if a specific benchmark was passed by the machine or not.
The percent number is the relative score reached to the minimum that is
needed. The --tolerance
flag is taken into account for this decision. For
example a benchmark that passes even with 95% since the tolerance was set to
10% would look like this: ✅ Pass ( 95.0 %)
.
Ideally all results show a Pass
and the program exits with code 0. Currently
some of the benchmarks can fail even on reference hardware; they are still being
improved to make them more deterministic.
Make sure to run nothing else on the machine when benchmarking it.
You can re-run them multiple times to get more reliable results.
--tolerance
A percent number to reduce the minimum requirement. This
should be used to ignore outliers of the benchmarks. The default value is 10%.--verify-duration
How long the verification benchmark should run.--disk-duration
How long the read and write benchmarks should run each.--allow-fail
Always exit the program with code 0.--chain
/ --dev
Specify the chain config to use. This will be used to
compare the results with the requirements of the chain (WIP).--base-path
License: Apache-2.0
⚠ The hardware does not meet the minimal requirements for role 'Authority'.
This error message may appear for different reasons:
a) You node has low-spec hardware.
b) Your node meets the minimum requirement, but:
you have other CPU/IO intensive process running while the node starts.
the quick check doesn't have any tolerance of slightly lower scores.
In order to decide if you should upgrade your hardware, you should stop the gear node and other resource-heavy processes, and run the full machine benchmark:
substrate-benchmark-machine --full
If some of the benchmarks still fail, then you should upgrade your hardware accordingly until you get all 5 ✅'s, otherwise you don't have to.
Note that in case you get low CPU scores, increasing the number of cores isn't gonna help because it measures only single-core performance, you should upgrade to more powerful processors to get higher scores.