Crates.io | syscoin |
lib.rs | syscoin |
version | 0.16.15 |
source | src |
created_at | 2019-02-04 04:51:50.430059 |
updated_at | 2019-02-10 04:42:17.151299 |
description | General purpose library for using and interoperating with Syscoin and other cryptocurrencies with AUXPOW support. |
homepage | https://github.com/syscoin/rust-bitcoin/ |
repository | https://github.com/syscoin/rust-bitcoin/ |
max_upload_size | |
id | 112539 |
size | 550,729 |
Library with support for de/serialization, parsing and executing on data structures and network messages related to Bitcoin and other blockchain-based currencies.
Supports (or should support)
For JSONRPC interaction with Bitcoin Core, it is recommended to use rust-jsonrpc which uses the underlying strason library which parses decimal numbers as strings, preventing precision errors.
This library must not be used for consensus code (i.e. fully validating blockchain data). It technically supports doing this, but doing so is very ill-advised because there are many deviations, known and unknown, between this library and the Bitcoin Core reference implementation. In a consensus based cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin it is critical that all parties are using the same rules to validate data, and this library is simply unable to implement the same rules as Core.
Given the complexity of both C++ and Rust, it is unlikely that this will ever be fixed, and there are no plans to do so. Of course, patches to fix specific consensus incompatibilities are welcome.
Currently the documentation is very sparse. Patches to add usage examples and to expand on existing docs would be extremely appreciated.
Patches which add support for non-Bitcoin cryptocurrencies by adding constants to existing enums (e.g. to set the network message magic-byte sequence) are welcome. Anything more involved will be considered on a case-by-case basis, as the altcoin landscape includes projects which frequently appear and disappear, and are poorly designed anyway and keeping the codebase maintainable is a large priority.
In general, things that improve cross-chain compatibility (e.g. support for cross-chain atomic swaps) are more likely to be accepted than things which support only a single blockchain.
See CHANGELOG.md