Crates.io | tested-fixture |
lib.rs | tested-fixture |
version | 1.0.1 |
source | src |
created_at | 2024-05-02 23:35:50.523871 |
updated_at | 2024-05-03 08:17:54.285509 |
description | Attribute macro for creating fixtures from tests |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/Daniel-Aaron-Bloom/tested-fixture |
max_upload_size | |
id | 1228248 |
size | 18,941 |
Attribute macro for creating fixtures from tests
Sometimes a series of tests are progressive or incremental; that is to say
one test builds on another. A multi-stage test might have complicated
setup and verification processes for each step, but with clear boundaries
between stages (test_1
verifies stage 1, test_2
verifies stage 2, etc.
). The problem arises when stages want to share data (i.e. test_2
wants
to start where test_1
left off).
Common advice is to duplicate all the setup code across all tests, or
alternatively to combine the tests into one large test. However the former
approach can significantly slow down tests if setup is costly, and also
introduces significant test maintenance costs if setup procedures change.
The latter however can lead to large and unruly testing functions which are
difficult to maintain, and doesn't solve the problem when dependencies
cross multiple files (i.e. unit tests which test the full setup process for a
Foo
are difficult to combine with unit tests which test the setup process
of a Bar
which relies on a fully constructed Foo
; should the "combined"
test live near Foo
or Bar
? What if the tests needs to access internals to
verify assertions?).
This crate provides an alternative approach by allowing a test to return a
fixture which can be used in subsequent tests. Tests can opt in to this
functionality by using a single attribute macro tested_fixture
.
When writing tests for code like:
struct Foo {
// ...
}
struct State {
// ...
}
impl Foo {
fn step_1() -> Self {
Foo {
// Complicated setup...
}
}
fn step_2(&self) -> State {
State {
// Complicated execution...
}
}
fn step_3(&self, v: &State) {
// Complicated execution...
}
}
An duplicated test setup would look something like
#[test]
fn step_1() {
let foo = Foo::step_1();
// Complicated assertions verify step 1...
}
#[test]
fn step_2() {
let foo = Foo::step_1();
// (Some?) Complicated assertions verify step 1...
foo.step_2();
// Complicated assertions verify step 2...
}
#[test]
fn step_3() {
let foo = Foo::step_1();
// (Some?) Complicated assertions verify step 1...
let state = foo.step_2();
// (Some?) Complicated assertions verify step 2...
foo.step_3(&state);
// Complicated assertions verify step 3...
}
As you can see, with a lot of steps, this can quickly get out of hand. To
clean it up is straightforward by switching to use the
tested_fixture
attribute instead of the normal test
.
// Save the fixture in a static variable called `STEP_1`
#[tested_fixture::tested_fixture(STEP_1)]
fn step_1() -> Foo {
let foo = Foo::step_1();
// Complicated assertions verify step 1...
foo
}
#[tested_fixture::tested_fixture(STEP_2_STATE)]
fn step_2() -> State {
let state = STEP_1.step_2();
// Complicated assertions verify step 2...
state
}
#[test]
fn step_3() {
STEP_1.step_3(&STEP_2_STATE);
// Complicated assertions verify step 3...
}
Note that when only step_2
is run, STEP_1
will be initialized on
first access. Since the order of tests is not guaranteed, this actually can
occur even if both tests are run. But since results are cached, the
step_1
test should still succeed (or fail) regardless of if it is run
first or not.
The tested_fixture
attribute supports attributes and a visibility level
prefixing the identifier, as well as an optional : type
suffix. This
optional suffix can be used on tests returning a Result
to specify that
only Ok
return values should be captured. For example:
#[tested_fixture::tested_fixture(
/// Doc comment on the `STEP_1` global variable
pub(crate) STEP_1: Foo
)]
fn step_1() -> Result<Foo, &'static str> {
// ...
}
Ordinary #[test]
functions are able to return anything which implements
std::process::Termination
, including unlimited nestings of Result
s.
While this crate does support returning nested Result
wrappings, it only
does so up to a fixed depth. Additionally it does not support returning any
other Termination
implementations besides Result
.
As with all testing-related global state, it is recommended that tests don't mutate the state, as doing so will increase the risk of flaky tests due to changes in execution order or timing. Thankfully this is the default behavior, as all fixtures defined by this crate are only accessible by non-mutable reference.
Right now this crate does not support async tests.
Licensed under
MIT license (LICENSE or https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)