Crates.io | tiny-xlib |
lib.rs | tiny-xlib |
version | 0.2.4 |
source | src |
created_at | 2023-05-26 03:29:59.191094 |
updated_at | 2024-12-02 01:03:05.964276 |
description | A tiny Xlib wrapper for Rust |
homepage | https://github.com/notgull/tiny-xlib |
repository | https://github.com/notgull/tiny-xlib |
max_upload_size | |
id | 874798 |
size | 60,587 |
A tiny set of bindings to the Xlib library.
The primary contemporary library for handling Xlib is the x11-dl
crate. However, there are three
primary issues.
You should not be using Xlib in 2023. Xlib is legacy code, and even that doesn't get across
how poor the API decisions that it's locked itself into are. It has a global error hook for
some reason, thread-safety is a mess, and it has so many soundness holes it might as well be made
out of swiss cheese. You should not be using Xlib. If you have to use Xlib, you should just
run all of your logic using the much more sound XCB library, or, even more ideally, something
like x11rb
. Then, you take the Display
pointer and use it for whatever legacy API you've
locked yourself into, and use XCB or x11rb
for everything else. Yes, I just called GLX
a legacy API. It's the 2020's now. Vulkan and wgpu
run everywhere aside from legacy machines.
Not to mention, they support XCB.
Even if you manage to use x11-dl
without tripping over the legacy API, it is a massive crate.
Xlib comes with quite a few functions, most of which are unnecessary in the 21st century.
Even if you don't use any of these and just stick to XCB, you still pay the price for it.
Binaries that use x11-dl
need to dedicate a significant amount of their binary and memory
space to the library. Even on Release builds, I have recorded x11-dl
taking up to seven
percent of the binary.
Global error handling. Xlib has a single global error hook. This is reminiscent of the Unix signal handling API, in that it makes it difficult to create well-modularized programs since they will fight with each-other over the error handlers. However, unlike the signal handling API, there is no way to tell if you're replacing an existing error hook.
tiny-xlib
aims to solve all of these problems. It provides a safe API around Xlib that is
conducive to being handed off to both XCB APIs and legacy Xlib APIs. The library only
imports absolutely necessary functions. In addition, it also provides a common API for
handling errors in a safe, modular way.
Display
structure.AsRawXcbConnection
, which allows it to be used with XCB APIs.Display
s and handling errors. If this library doesn't support some
feature, it's probably intentional. You should use XCB or x11rb
instead. This includes:Xlib-xcb
.use as_raw_xcb_connection::AsRawXcbConnection;
use tiny_xlib::Display;
use x11rb::connection::Connection;
use x11rb::xcb_ffi::XCBConnection;
// Open a display.
let display = Display::new(None)?;
// Get the XCB connection.
let xcb_conn = display.as_raw_xcb_connection();
// Use that pointer to create a new XCB connection.
let xcb_conn = unsafe {
XCBConnection::from_raw_xcb_connection(xcb_conn.cast(), false)?
};
// Register a handler for X11 errors.
tiny_xlib::register_error_handler(Box::new(|_, error| {
println!("X11 error: {:?}", error);
false
}));
// Do whatever you want with the XCB connection.
loop {
println!("Event: {:?}", xcb_conn.wait_for_event()?);
}
Licensed under either of
at your option.
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.