Crates.io | wherr-macro |
lib.rs | wherr-macro |
version | 0.1.7 |
source | src |
created_at | 2023-08-11 02:49:04.584154 |
updated_at | 2023-09-01 19:12:42.319656 |
description | Enhance Rust errors with file and line details using the `#[wherr]` macro for clearer debugging. |
homepage | |
repository | https://github.com/joelonsql/wherr |
max_upload_size | |
id | 941532 |
size | 8,554 |
wherr
CrateEnhance Rust's ?
operator by appending file and line number details to errors, simplifying the debugging process.
?
.anyhow
error handling through the anyhow
feature flag.wherr
?When using the ?
operator in Rust, errors propagated don't usually provide file and line number details about where the error occurs. Especially in nested function calls with multiple potential error points, this absence of detailed info can be a debugging headache.
wherr
remedies this, giving you precise location data for your errors.
Add the following to your Cargo.toml
:
[dependencies]
wherr = "0.1"
For anyhow
support:
[dependencies]
wherr = { version = "0.1", features = ["anyhow"] }
By simply annotating your functions with #[wherr]
, errors propagated using ?
will also include the file and line number.
#[wherr]
.use wherr::wherr;
#[wherr]
fn concat_files(path1: &str, path2: &str) -> Result<String, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let mut content1 = std::fs::read_to_string(path1)?;
let content2 = std::fs::read_to_string(path2)?;
content1.push_str(&content2);
Ok(content1)
}
Run the provided example:
cargo run --example with_wherr
This will highlight the difference wherr
makes. Your error will now indicate exactly where the issue arises:
error at wherr/examples/with_wherr.rs:5
anyhow
:Ensure you've added the anyhow
feature as shown in the installation section. Then:
use anyhow::{Context, Result};
use wherr::wherr;
#[wherr]
fn concat_files(path1: &str, path2: &str) -> Result<String> {
let mut content1 = std::fs::read_to_string(path1).with_context(|| format!("Failed to read {}", path1))?;
let content2 = std::fs::read_to_string(path2).with_context(|| format!("Failed to read {}", path2))?;
content1.push_str(&content2);
Ok(content1)
}
Run the provided example:
cargo run --features=anyhow --example anyhow
This will highlight the difference wherr
makes. Your error will now indicate exactly where the issue arises:
error at wherr/examples/anyhow.rs:6
The #[wherr]
notation is a proc_macro_attribute, which allows for code transformations at compile time.
When an error is propagated using the ?
operator inside a #[wherr]
annotated function, the macro captures the file and line number where the error occurred.
Essentially, the function:
#[wherr]
fn add(s1: &str, s2: &str) -> Result<i64, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
...
let i1 = i64::from_str_radix(s1, radix)?;
...
}
... is transformed to:
fn add(s1: &str, s2: &str) -> Result<i64, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
...
let i1 = wherr::wherrapper(i64::from_str_radix(s1, radix), file!(), line!())?;
...
}
The magic happens inside wherrapper
. It checks the given result, and if it's an error, wraps it with file and line details.
Dive deeper into the problem wherr
solves and the Rust concepts involved with our detailed examples.
wherr
is divided into two separate crates because of Rust's restriction against mixing normal functions and procedural macros in the same crate:
wherr
:
This is the main library that offers the enhanced functionality for error
handling in Rust.wherr-macro
:
Contains the procedural macros specifically designed for the wherr
crate.If you're interested in contributing to wherr
, please follow standard
Rust community guidelines and submit a PR on our repository.
This project is dual licensed under MIT License and Apache License.