| Crates.io | zbus-lockstep-macros |
| lib.rs | zbus-lockstep-macros |
| version | 0.5.1 |
| created_at | 2023-08-31 12:28:39.882354+00 |
| updated_at | 2025-06-24 18:22:44.90721+00 |
| description | Macros to keep types in lockstep with DBus XML definitions |
| homepage | |
| repository | https://github.com/luukvanderduim/zbus-lockstep |
| max_upload_size | |
| id | 959892 |
| size | 33,025 |
zbus-lockstep-macros extends zbus-lockstep to match the signature of signal types <T as zvariant::Type>::signature() with a corresponding signature from a DBus XML file more conveniently and succinctly.
In the context of IPC over DBus, especially where there are multiple implementations of servers and/or clients communicating, it is necessary for each implementation to send what others expect and that expectations are in accordance with what is sent over the bus.
The XML protocol-descriptions may act as a shared frame of reference or "single source of all truth" for all implementers.
Having a single point of reference helps all implementers meet expectations on protocol conformance.
Keeping the types you send over DBus in lockstep with currently valid protocol-descriptions will reduce chances of miscommunication or failure to communicate.
Add zbus-lockstep-macros to Cargo.toml's dependencies:
[dependencies]
zbus-lockstep-macros = "0.5.1"
If the DBus XML descriptions can be found in the crates root,
in either xml/ or XML/, validating the type can be as easy as:
use zbus_lockstep_macros::validate;
use zvariant::Type;
#[validate]
#[derive(Type)]
struct BirthdayEvent {
name: String,
new_age: u8,
}
Note that the macro assumes that the member name is contained in the struct name. You can provide the member name if you have another naming-scheme in use.
Also, it may be necessary to disambiguate if multiple interfaces across the DBus
descriptions provide signals with the same name.
Any of the arguments are optional.
#[validate(xml: <xml_path>, interface: <interface_name>, member: <member_name>)]
See also the crates docs for more detailed descriptions of the arguments.
MIT